After a three-day XSLT course, students filled in a standard evaluation
form. The answers have been split into good aspects and suggested
improvements.
Good |
Improvements |
- [Covered expectations.]
- Slides: 9/10; instruction: 9/10.
|
|
- [Covered expectations.]
- Charlie working through answers by doing stylesheets
from scratch - showing us the "approach".
- Instruction: 8/10.
|
- Course material - hard to understand on its own but it
may be my lack of experience with HTML.
- Slides: 6/10.
|
- Very good base for XSL - I learned a lot.
- I really enjoyed the exercise on XPath.
- Thank you for the nice course.
- Slides: 8/10; instruction: 8/10.
|
- [Could use] slightly more information on slides: some
were a little too simple.
- At times we were rushed, but I don't think it's because
of instructor. One more day would help this.
|
- [Covered expectations.]
- Slides: 8/10; instruction: 8/10.
|
- Use some better real-world examples, instead of things
like a, b, c, d etc.
- Maybe use some more unads-on examples.
|
- [Covered expectations.]
- I enjoyed the class.
- Slides: 8/10; instruction: 10/10.
|
- Some of the slides looked a little busy, so sometimes it
was hard to catch all of the details in a short amount
of time.
|
- [Covered expectations.]
- Very helpful - and surprisingly a bit entertaining
(I obviously didn't expect this).
- Slides: 8/10; instruction: 10/10.
|
- Make it easier to tell the difference between chapters -
as well as the exercises.
|
- [Covered expectations] and more.
- Hands-on eercises really enforced what was being taught.
- I personally got a lot out of this course and think it
was extremely well organized and presented.
- Slides: 10/10; instruction: 10/10.
|
- Only thing I would have changed - not sure if it would
have been possible, though - would be to have the course
taught in a room where we wouldn't have to sit in the
dark all day.
|