After a three-day XSLT course, students were asked for the
best and worst aspects of the course.
| Best |
Worst |
- Instructor was patient and his presentation was very clear.
|
- Too little time to cover everything, since there's also questions asked.
|
- Trainer's way of presenting the information.
|
- Lack of administrative preparation (missing time schedule, computers, catering, ...).
|
- Getting explanations/clarification on XSL rules that I have acquired knowledge of myself from working with XSL already.
|
- Not being able to 'try out' what we are learning with
examples on a PC, which would have helped me understand or
remember things a lot better, once I take it back to the workplace.
[Unfortunately, there weren't enough computers for this hands-on course.]
|
- Instructor knows his stuff (very well!).
- Integrated well within the group.
|
- Not suited (partly suited) for beginners - very technical.
- Slides should include more diagrams.
|
- Time spent on understanding node/tree relationships.
- Polling attendees on expectations.
- Follow-up on expectations to assure needs met.
|
- Some examples on slides more convoluted than necessary.
- Invalid examples should be better identified in slides.
|
|
- Too much HTML. [Company focus is on XML-to-XML transformations.]
|
Incremental Development, Inc.